Your Position: Home > News > Industry News

Why don’t modern militaries use full face helmets?

DATE: Jan 30th, 2024

In the realm of modern military equipment, the choice of helmets is a critical decision, impacting everything from soldier comfort to combat effectiveness. While some may envision full-face helmets akin to halos as the pinnacle of protection, the reality is far more nuanced, with numerous factors influencing their practicality on the battlefield.

Peripheral Vision: Combat environments demand acute situational awareness, a facet compromised by full-face helmets. Their design restricts peripheral vision, potentially impeding a soldier's ability to swiftly identify threats or maneuver effectively.

Communication: Effective communication is paramount in military operations, yet full-face helmets hinder this vital aspect. Shouting becomes muffled, radio transmissions may be garbled, impeding coordination among troops and compromising mission success.

Comfort and Breathability: Under duress, soldiers contend with fogged visors and stifling heat, impairing vision and causing discomfort. The exertion of combat exacerbates these issues, making breathability and ventilation crucial factors in helmet design.

Mobility and Agility: Bulky full-face helmets weigh down soldiers, impeding their agility and mobility, factors critical in fluid combat situations. Maneuverability is further compromised by the additional weight and bulkiness of such helmets.

Adaptability and Concealment: Military operations often require helmets that can accommodate various accessories and camouflage covers, a challenge for bulkier designs. Concealment becomes more difficult, potentially compromising tactical advantage.

Water Hazards: Crossing bodies of water poses a significant risk with full-face helmets, increasing the likelihood of flooding and drowning. Their enclosed design makes water ingress inevitable, posing a hazard to the wearer.

Protection vs. Weight: While full-face helmets offer comprehensive protection, their added weight and bulkiness may not justify the marginal increase in safety, particularly when considering the trade-off with mobility and comfort.

Unpopularity among Soldiers: Soldiers prioritize equipment that enhances their survivability and effectiveness while minimizing encumbrance. The discomfort and limitations imposed by full-face helmets render them unpopular among troops, impacting morale and operational readiness.

Limited Blunt Impact Protection: While structured similarly to bike helmets, full-face military helmets may provide some protection against blunt impact to the mid-face and jaw. However, their effectiveness against ballistic injuries remains limited, underscoring the need for a balanced approach to helmet design.

In conclusion, while the concept of full-face helmets may seem appealing in theory, their practical drawbacks outweigh their potential benefits in modern military contexts. Militaries must prioritize helmets that strike a balance between protection, comfort, mobility, and functionality to ensure the safety and effectiveness of their troops in combat situations.